Wednesday 23 April 2014

BYOD – Hot trend getting hotter

Technology trends come and go, but one educational technology trend that is hot at the moment is BYOD (or Bring Your Own Device).

Clearly the BYOD phenomenon in schools is not black and white or cut and dried.

The practice of BYOD by schools across Australia lies on a spectrum from little or no engagement with BYOD, to BYOD practices which result in sophisticated teaching and learning programs. 

At the lower end of the spectrum students are bringing their own devices to school, but still some schools are demanding that students place these devices in bins at the front of the classroom to resist the temptation of texting, watching videos or playing games. These schools have not embraced the potential of these devices to make an instructional difference.


At the upper end of the spectrum things look very different. Here schools appreciate the enormous benefits of students using their own devices for learning – proven benefits such as increases in productivity, engagement and opportunities for personalized instruction to name a few.

To get to this point, schools operating at the upper end of the BYOD spectrum have had to overcome some well documented obstacles.

Firstly these schools have succeeded in gaining school leader, teacher and parent acceptance of the BYOD phenomenon, which is not an easy task.

They are managing the equity issues which inevitably arise. They have found a way for each child to have access to a device and have provided the connectivity to access resources from home.

Security for these schools is an issue but not an insurmountable obstacle. Through mobile device management and other ways of protecting and strengthening the school’s infrastructure, they have managed to calm some of the security fears about BYOD.

As BYOD programs gain momentum, schools save money on devices. Astute schools funnel any savings into growing the network capability and network expertise – ensuring the sustainability of these BYOD programs and the quality of student learning.


Tuesday 8 April 2014

The Flipped Classroom - the other side of “the flip”

There are many definitions of the flipped classroom and as many views about what constitutes one.

A strong and coherent statement about the flipped classroom should focus on both sides of “the flip”:

  • What should go on in the classroom?
  • What should be pursued outside of the classroom?



In class time

The main reason, maybe the only reason, to flip a class is to provide more class time for learning, where the teaching and learning professional – the classroom teacher – engages with the students to help them develop higher orders of critical thinking. Students spend class time engaging with the teaching and learning professional and fellow students, to work on assigned problems and interactive activities to illustrate concepts.

In short, students receive more, personalized, instructional support in the classroom from the expert and practice applying key concepts with feedback.

It is difficult to argue with this view of the in class time side of “the flip”.

It is how it should be! The professionals use their knowledge and skills to support and guide students as they occupy their in class time with collaborative work and concept mastering exercises.

Outside class time

Arguably it is on this side of “the flip” that the deficiencies of the flipped classroom are most exposed.
Typically on this side of “the flip” lecture style teaching is banished from in class time and delivered outside class time – usually to the home – via current technologies such as video, live lectures online, video podcasts and more.

These lecture style teachings provide the base content for the concepts students must learn and manipulate in their in class time. If the students aren't exposed to this base content, and many won’t be, where does that leave them?  They will not have the necessary pre-requisite knowledge to move to the next crucial step of working with the professional in class time on assigned problems and interactive activities to illustrate concepts – and consequently they will not develop their higher order critical thinking skills.

More work needs to be done on how to structure and monitor the activities assigned to outside class time. There are many ways in which this could be done – and if the flipped classroom is to survive as a credible teaching paradigm – it must be done.

How do you structure and monitor this other side of “the flip”?